Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
I am a real enthusiast in the H4831 powder. I get wonderful velocity and accuracy outside of any caliber I have tried using it in. From the 25-06 up towards the 338 it's my visit powder of preference. I check out every kind of powders when Doing the job up loads, though the H4831 normally seems to occur out on top for accuracy and velocity when the situation is with the 06 course or larger.
In relation to bench rest matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted additional wins than all other propellants merged. A wonderful extruded powder, it flows precisely and with ease through steps and delivers match-quality accuracy when put to employ.
It truly is likely that no even further discussion is needed, in which case we advocate starting a whole new thread. If nevertheless you are feeling your reaction is needed you can even now accomplish that.
Indeed you are able to. They are really the exact same precise powder but the SC powder is just Minimize shorter so it meters much better.
My practical experience is that the SC and SSC loaded to the exact same excess weight as being the lengthy Slice shows a decreased velocity.
Did you at any time try H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Shooting 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with common chamber. Wondering what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the only real serious change would be that the shortcut meters much better via reloading gear. As soon as It is loaded theres no functional difference. I have listened to the shortcut might have a tiny little bit faster melt away level but It appears insignificant.
excaliber stated: I've uncovered the precise reverse for being correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly precise powder in my 300 Win Mag.
Using the shorter Lower version powder arrives up to the base of your decreased shoulder so I nevertheless have many area.
It's humorous how over time loading many different cartridges in numerous rifles that I have not attained satisfactory close final results with H-4831 or maybe the quick-Slice version.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, They are fully various powders, with IMR 4831 remaining considerably more quickly when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Do not address them as the same powder, since they most surely are not.
It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC h4831sc to test. Identified a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot group currently. It really is a little slower than H1000, but shoots very good. Thanks for the recommendation, It really is good to are aware that I have acquired solutions when one particular or one other powder is dried up.
Some of the previous Lyman data just shown IMR 4831, which was surplus military powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
I could stack em in a single gap but I h4831sc wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Soon after months, I bought lucky and caught some H1000 on the web not to mention paid somewhat excess. The extremely following 7 days in a gun display a guy had an entire circumstance of H1000 for $forty h4831 vs h4831sc per 1lb. I neglect the amount of, but While using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.